Most people decide this by hunch, and most people work 'top-down' ...but there may be a better way.
[Note: For a discussion of how many batches to use, click here.]
In deciding the best sequence (and choosing what to put in each of your Batches) you can aim to emulate whatever sequence you may have used previously in doing the timetable manually.
Three examples:
Example 1 In an 11-18 school the sequence might be typically: Sixth Form (R-Reserve the time-slots for any Container Blocks here first) Year 11 Year 10 Year 9 Year 8 Year 7. |
Example 2 A better sequence might be: Year 11 Year 10 Sixth Form (R-Reserve the time-slots for the Container Blocks first) Year 9 Year 8 Year 7. The reason is that it is usually easier to solve problems in the Sixth Form than in Years 11 and 10. In fact a standard timetabling tactic is to plunder the Sixth Form to solve a problem lower down, and then find a solution for the Sixth Form later. For more details see 'The TimeTabler's CookBook', sections 12.10, 11.6. |
Example 3 Investigating the best 'batting order' If at any stage you get a kickout(s) then back-track to the previous step and take a different route. For example, suppose in trying the sequence above, you get some kickouts at step 5 when trying to place Year 8-Big. At a later stage, suppose you have problems placing Year 8-Small. These experiments in different permutations can help to clarify which are the difficult parts of your timetable Then Delete this 'Trial' schedule so that your Batches are ready to use to develop the real schedule. |